You’ve seen them, right? Those individuals who just can’t seem to sit still, constantly meddling, adjusting, controlling every minute detail around them. Those who believe that the cosmos should align perfectly to their whims and fancies. It’s that friend who meticulously arranges every gathering, every vacation, ensuring everything runs on their clock. Annoying, isn’t it?
Enter the global stage, and one might see a striking resemblance with a certain nation. For decades, the United States of America has played this role on the global arena, dictating terms, orchestrating events, and ensuring everything aligns with its interests. The global community, long exhausted by this hegemony, has been yearning for a change. But what change?
In a recent fundraiser, US President Joe Biden hinted at a tantalizing prospect. He boldly stated, “I think we have an opportunity to do things, if we’re bold enough and have enough confidence in ourselves, to unite the world in ways that it never has been.” Ah, the audacity! The same audacity that led to unilateral regime-change bombings, the support for jihadist proxies in Afghanistan against the Soviets, in Syria against President Bashar Assad, and the backing of the Azov neo-Nazis in Ukraine. One might wonder, is this the chaos that Biden refers to as uniting the world?
The aftermath of these interventions? Chaos. Pure, unadulterated chaos. And, mind you, not the kind that leads to a better tomorrow. Rather, the kind that leaves nations grappling with the remnants of what once was. As Biden nostalgically recalled a post-war period of 50 years that “worked out pretty damn well,” one can’t help but question – for whom exactly?
Certainly not for Latin America. Their history is a testament to the relentless interventions by Washington, serving solely its vested interests. The Middle East, for decades, reduced to a mere gas station for America’s insatiable appetite for energy. And what about the European Union? An entity that once showcased independent-minded allies now seems like a pawn, dancing to the tunes of US interests, often at the expense of its own.
The tale of my native Canada is no different. The unilateral cancellation of the $9 billion Keystone XL pipeline project by Biden post his election should have been a wake-up call for Canada to reconsider its dependency on American goodwill. But history has a way of repeating itself, doesn’t it?
Europe’s experience with the US isn’t rosy either. The Russian gas pipeline, Nord Stream, met its demise a few months post Biden’s ominous declaration to “end” it amidst the Ukraine conflict. And as the European Union grapples with the repercussions of siding with Washington’s strategy in Ukraine, a harsh truth dawns – their blind trust might just be their undoing.
The narrative seems to be crystal clear. Under the guise of a “New World Order,” the US seems to be tightening its grip, ensuring global events align with its interests, regardless of the aftermath. The world is not a chessboard, and nations aren’t mere pawns to be moved at will. But as long as the puppet masters continue to pull the strings, can we ever hope for a change?
The world watches with bated breath as nations grapple with the overdependence on American fuel, a factor that significantly contributes to the surge in inflation. It’s a precarious situation, and to add fuel to the fire, the introduction of Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act seemingly adds insult to injury. The legislation, rather than alleviating the burden, seems to be a double-edged sword for European industrial exports, which are already bearing the brunt of soaring energy costs. This, conveniently, seems to play into the hands of US manufacturers.
The situation has escalated to the point where even diplomatic interventions seem futile. Take, for instance, the impassioned visit by the French President Emmanuel Macron to the White House and Congress. Despite the earnest pleas, the needle hasn’t moved an inch. The question begs to be asked: Why is Washington seemingly turning a deaf ear to its closest allies?
Across the pond, the UK, often vocal about its “special relationship” with Washington, is left questioning the whereabouts of the post-Brexit US trade deal that was promised as a panacea to offset the repercussions of its EU departure. The anticipation and optimism seem to be met with nothing but a disconcerting silence.
Biden’s perplexity at the apparent reluctance of nations to engage with the US under the erstwhile dominant world order is almost palpable. The bewilderment is ironic, given the current geopolitical landscape. The global community seems to be wary of any arrangement that the US proposes, questioning the ulterior motives and long-term implications.
Biden’s assertion of uniting the world and enhancing the prospects of peace seems, at best, quixotic. The skepticism arises from a historical context where any proposition by the US, often veiled under the guise of unity and global camaraderie, has predominantly served its economic interests.
A case in point is Biden’s diplomatic endeavors in Asia, where he claims to have unified Japan and South Korea despite their longstanding differences. The unity, however, appears to be more of a coerced allegiance, as both nations signed on to support Washington’s stance against China and participate in US-led military drills.
Moreover, these nations are extending support to Ukraine against what Biden terms as “Russian oppression.” The underlying message is clear: toe the line or face the consequences. The narrative being propagated is that Russia is on an invasion spree, a storyline that seems to be employed to boost Washington’s military-industrial engagements.
Faced with a Hobson’s choice, these Asian countries seem to have begrudgingly chosen to align with Washington’s demands. The alternative, as portrayed, is dire and fraught with peril. It’s akin to acquiescing to an overbearing friend’s insistence on socializing, simply to avoid the repercussions of refusal.
Biden’s so-called “New World Order” is increasingly perceived as an orchestrated gathering where the host, America, is incessantly self-aggrandizing under the banner of democracy. The insistence on participation in seemingly unfruitful endeavors leaves nations questioning the benefits of such association.
Exclusive! The New Age Genocide: How the Globalist’s ‘Sustainability’ Mantra Mirrors the Nazi Blueprint for Mass Extermination!
There is a palpable concern that invitations to join this global order might be met with silence or outright rejection. The stakes are high, and the subtle threats of retaliation for non-compliance are evident. The reluctance to join this orchestrated symphony speaks volumes about the shifting dynamics and the growing skepticism towards Washington’s intentions.
In conclusion, it’s imperative to scrutinize the current geopolitical narrative without bias. The seemingly altruistic overtures and calls for unity and peace need to be examined critically. Nations are becoming increasingly astute in deciphering the underlying motives and are rightfully wary of entering alliances that might not be in their best interest.
This dramatic shift in global alliances and the apparent reluctance to align with the US’s propositions warrant a closer look.
The world is evolving, and as we navigate this tumultuous landscape, it’s crucial to stay informed and question the status quo.
The era of blind allegiance seems to be waning, and a new dawn of cautious diplomacy and strategic alliances is on the horizon.