Sunday, June 23, 2024

Net Zero Carbon by 2050: Savior of the Environment or Prelude to an Economic Apocalypse?

The great hall of the Davos World Economic Forum echoes with the collective call for achieving "net zero carbon" by 2050.

The great hall of the Davos World Economic Forum echoes with the collective call for achieving “net zero carbon” by 2050. It’s a global aspiration that seems far-off, easily shrugged off as a tomorrow problem. Yet, whether we acknowledge it or not, the intricate dance of change is well underway. From the United States to Germany and beyond, nations are orchestrating the creation of what was once tagged in the 70’s as the New International Economic Order.

Unbelievable Life Hacks REVEALED! Click NOW to Unlock Secrets the World is Keeping From You!

While the 2050 target might sound like a benevolent climate goal, there’s a covert, chilling narrative emerging from beneath this seemingly well-intentioned layer. The reality we are shaping looks alarmingly similar to a global technocratic totalitarian corporatism, a structure that is prophesied to birth unemployment, deindustrialization, and economic downfall on a mammoth scale. Intriguingly, this isn’t a random prophecy but a meticulously designed agenda.

The architect of this grand design, Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF), has been promoting his ambitious plan for a global economic reboot, or the “Great Reset”. The entire puzzle starts making sense once we decipher the true implications of the globalists’ desired “Net Zero Carbon” by 2050.

Europe has embarked on the mission of becoming the world’s first “carbon-neutral” continent by 2050, and in the shorter term, aiming to slash its CO2 emissions by at least 55% by 2030. These lofty ambitions, however, harbor an underbelly of potential pitfalls and contrived narratives.

Bill Gates, the self-appointed global vaccine czar, wrote on his blog in August 2020, “As awful as this pandemic is, climate change could be worse… The relatively small decline in emissions this year makes one thing clear: We cannot get to zero emissions simply—or even mostly—by flying and driving less.”

Despite wielding considerable power over mainstream and social media, the subtle shroud over the Global Warming lobby’s ulterior motives continues to go unnoticed by most of the world. The proposed solution — an elimination of hydrocarbons, including petroleum, natural gas, coal, and even “carbon-free” nuclear electricity by 2050 — does not resonate with scientific principles but serves a darker, manipulative agenda.

Make Medicine, Stockpile Endless Food, and Access Pure Water Anywhere. Click NOW to Unleash Your Survival Superpowers!

It’s noteworthy to explore the original scientific thesis that sparked this massive shift in energy sources. Initially, it wasn’t climate change but global warming, an alleged by-product of solar-led warming cycles and emissions, that was pointed to as the looming danger. However, as the solar warming cycle showed signs of ebbing, Al Gore and his cohort smartly pivoted the narrative from global warming to “Climate Change”. Soon, every hurricane, winter storm, and freak weather event started being marketed as a “climate crisis”. It seems the Climate Gods were not too pleased with our CO2-emitting tendencies.

The linchpin of the alternative energy transition — the demonization of CO2 as a harmful greenhouse gas — is hinged on scientific misrepresentations. The vilified CO2, which is an invisible, odorless gas crucial to plant photosynthesis and life on earth, is not capable of rising to the atmosphere to cause the dreaded greenhouse effect. The truth is, CO2 has a molecular weight that is 1.5 times greater than air, suggesting that it wouldn’t ascend from car exhausts or power plants to form the feared environmental hazard.

To truly grasp the insidious nature of the global action unfolding around the likes of Gates, Schwab, and advocates of a so-called “sustainable” world economy, we must travel back to 1968. That’s when David Rockefeller, underpinned by wealth from oil, launched a movement that painted human consumption and population growth as the world’s primary problems. He created the Club of Rome and funded a study at MIT titled ‘Limits to Growth’ in 1972.

Maurice Strong, a key accomplice in this ‘zero growth’ agenda, was an advocate for the unfounded theory that man-made emissions were leading to a drastic and uncontrollable rise in global temperatures, thus threatening civilization. Strong coined the term “sustainable development”. He said, “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” This is the insidious agenda now known as the Great Reset or UN Agenda 2030.

The reality of our ‘green’ future is stark. In 2011, the German government imposed a ban on nuclear electricity by 2022. The alternative energy sources, namely solar and wind, have proven to be expensive and unreliable, leading to an economic crisis in the country. The shift has put a strain on energy-intensive industries and poses an imminent threat of millions of job losses. Germany’s ambitious push towards electric vehicles further threatens the nation’s auto sector.

It appears the Zero Carbon agenda is not simply a well-intentioned goal for climate betterment, but rather an orchestrated scheme for deindustrialization. As a core component of the Great Reset and Agenda 2030, the backward turning of the world economy aims to severely limit air travel, car travel, and people movement, closing “polluting” industries, all in the name of reducing CO2. It’s uncanny how the coronavirus pandemic conveniently sets the stage for the Great Reset and UN Agenda 2030 Net Zero Carbon.

Also Read – DARPA’s Bio-lab Horror Story: Are We on The Brink of an Unprecedented Ecological Catastrophe?

The grand plan appears to be steering us towards a dystopian future where depopulation is inevitable and the most advanced economies collapse, as per Maurice Strong’s prophecy. Christiana Figueres, former executive secretary of the UN’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, put it succinctly in her 2015 remarks, “This is the first time in human history that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally changing the economic development model that has reigned since the Industrial Revolution.”

To sum up, the promise of a “Net Zero Carbon” world by 2050 conceals a controversial and dramatic transformation — a blueprint for a totalitarian regime where individual freedoms are curtailed, and economies crumble under the weight of unsustainable energy alternatives. This clandestine agenda, now rolled out as the Great Reset and the Net Zero Carbon ruse, might be the most dramatic pivot our global society has yet to face. As we look towards 2050, it’s incumbent upon us all to question, challenge and, if necessary, resist the imposition of this seemingly benevolent but potentially disastrous new world order.

Helena Carey
Helena Carey
Helena Carey is a seasoned news author renowned for her engaging storytelling and insightful analysis. With a decade of journalism experience, she's a trusted voice in the ever-evolving news landscape.

Latest news


editor picks


Your support is crucial. Every donation is deeply appreciated and will directly aid in upholding our mission. Thank you for joining the fight for independent journalism!


Subscribe to Newsletter for new blog posts and more. Let's stay updated!

Related news