In a bold and potentially divisive move, the European Union’s “Energy Performance of Buildings Directive” has stirred up a storm of controversy. This legislative tool, dictating the energy performance standards for buildings within the EU, is now at the forefront of what some are calling a massive wealth transfer scheme. Let’s delve into this contentious issue.
By the year 2030, the EU has set an ambitious goal to slash greenhouse gas emissions by a minimum of 55%. Fast forward to 2050, and the vision expands to encompass every building—be it commercial, public, or residential—across the EU, all adhering to zero-emission standards. The path to this green future? A series of rigorous new renewable energy requirements thrust upon homeowners.
Take heating systems, for instance. Those relying on fossil fuels are on the brink of extinction, set to be entirely phased out by 2035. Homeowners, brace yourselves! You’re expected to switch to new “green,” likely electric, heating systems—and bear the financial burden. The staggering cost of these energy upgrades? Around 100,000 euros for a typical residential house.
The underlying goal, as some critics argue, seems to force people out of their homes. Can’t afford the upgrades? You might have to sell your home, paving the way for asset management companies to swoop in, buy them out, and transform them into rentals.
Adding fuel to the fire, on September 20, 2023, the U.N. General Assembly (UNGA) president bypassed a full assembly vote to approve a declaration on pandemic prevention. This move, assigning pandemic authority to the WHO, was made despite the objections of 11 member states and should have stalled a consensus adoption of the declaration. But, bending the rules, the U.N. allowed the UNGA president to approve the declaration, sidestepping the General Assembly.
In a revealing video, Bjorn Andreas Bull-Hansen, a renowned Norwegian novelist, sheds light on how the EU’s “Energy Performance of Buildings Directive” is set to orchestrate this massive wealth transfer. As part of a “Fit for 55” package, the EU Parliament voted in March 2023 to revise this directive, aiming for a minimum 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
By 2050, the EU’s goal is nothing short of a “zero-emission and fully decarbonized building stock.” In essence, every building within the EU, irrespective of its use, must comply with zero-emission standards by 2050. Homeowners, get ready for a wave of new requirements.
With fossil fuel-based heating systems on their way out by 2035, the onus falls on homeowners to adopt new “green” heating solutions, with the financial burden squarely on their shoulders. Bull-Hansen estimates these new energy requirements could cost a residential homeowner about 100,000 euros.
A Deep Dive into the Changing Landscape of Ownership
Bjorn Andreas Bull-Hansen, a noted voice in current socio-economic discussions, brings to light a startling agenda: the push to dispossess individuals of their homes and, ultimately, their sense of ownership. This controversial strategy, he explains, is not just a fleeting trend but a deliberate effort to reshape the foundations of personal property rights.
Let’s unravel this narrative.
The mechanism is stark: can’t afford mandatory home upgrades? Then prepare to sell your home. Yet, there’s a twist. Giants like BlackRock and Vanguard lurk in the shadows, ready to snap up these properties. But what if your home isn’t up to the new standards? There’s a chilling possibility that the government might deem it unsellable, seize it, or slap you with a fine.
In the U.S., the situation took a dramatic turn in early 2021. BlackRock and Vanguard began bulk-buying residential homes, opting to rent them out instead of reselling. This strategy didn’t just erode middle-class homeownership; it also artificially inflated home prices, pushing the dream of owning a home even further out of reach for many.
The ripple effect is evident. Rent prices have soared, and the subsequent energy upgrades will only add to this burden. The result? A generation struggling to afford rent, let alone homeownership, resorting to living with parents or cramming into shared spaces. The specter of increased homelessness looms large.
Mass Arrests, Gold-Backed Money, and the Fall of the Elite: The Upcoming Global Financial Shockwave!
Bull-Hansen links this worrying trend to the broader agenda of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Great Reset, Agenda 2030, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Different names, he argues, for a unified plan aiming to reshape the very notion of ownership.
The WEF’s “8 Predictions for the World in 2030” video, where they declare, “by 2030 you will own nothing,” starkly illustrates this agenda. It’s a world where everything becomes a service, and the concept of personal ownership vanishes.
Consider the evolution in software ownership. Once, buying a software meant owning a physical disc, usable indefinitely. Now, it’s about subscribing to cloud-based services, with ongoing payments that, over time, dwarf the one-time purchase cost.
This shift isn’t just about software; it’s a glimpse into a future where everything, from your home to your daily necessities, is rented, not owned.
The Threat to Homeownership: A Dire Warning for the Middle Class
Bjorn Andreas Bull-Hansen raises a stark warning about the future of homeownership. Traditionally, owning a home has been a key to building generational wealth and defining the middle class. Bull-Hansen argues that removing this ability would not only obliterate the middle class but also create a polarized society of the very rich and the very poor.
“It doesn’t matter if you believe this will be good for the environment or not. This is about controlling you… This is a wealth transfer,” he asserts, emphasizing that the issue transcends environmental concerns and delves into control and power dynamics.
“If you take ownership away, what you’re left with is feudalism,” he continues, highlighting the risk of a future where a few ‘elites’ own everything, leaving the majority powerless. His message is a call to action: ownership must be defended to avoid a return to a feudal-like society.
A Call for Resistance in the Face of a Global Power Shift
Bjorn Andreas Bull-Hansen’s call for peaceful disobedience resonates more urgently than ever. “We MUST be disobedient now,” he declares, painting a stark choice between resistance and a future akin to serfdom. This isn’t just about losing freedoms we’ve always taken for granted, like unrestricted travel, but also about an orchestrated stripping away of our wealth and the means to accumulate it in the future.
The encroaching threat isn’t limited to home ownership. Imagine a world where a central bank digital currency (CBDC) reigns, where interest on savings is a relic, taxes are extracted automatically, and your spending is tightly controlled, even to the point of setting expiration dates on your own money. This isn’t just financial control; it’s a pathway to a powerless, dependent existence.
The globalist cabal behind this, as Bull-Hansen points out, aims to forge a permanent underclass devoid of rights, freedoms, or escape routes. If we passively accept these “green” proposals, billed as necessary for environmental stewardship but potentially a guise for wealth redistribution, we’re not just compromising our present but shackling future generations to a cycle of poverty and dependence.
How will you resist when control becomes all-encompassing? Imagine a future where your bank accounts can be frozen on a whim, access to basic necessities like groceries is gatekept, and your movements are restricted by the very technology meant to empower you. This isn’t science fiction; it’s a potential reality in a world governed by an AI-driven surveillance system, intertwined with digital identities, programmable currencies, and a unified ledger system.
Yes, there will be consequences for standing against this tide, as Bull-Hansen warns. Disobedience will have its price. But, if we collectively choose to bear this cost now, the seemingly unstoppable march of this globalist agenda can be halted. Their plan hinges on our compliance. Our collective refusal is their Achilles heel.
BREAKING! Prime Minister Morawiecki’s Resignation Exposes Global Corruption Web and Deep State Manipulation!
Unveiling the Architects of Global Governance: A Deep Dive into the Rising Influence of the WHO
For those new to the subject, you might be curious about the identities of these “globalists” orchestrating what appears to be a global power shift. I won’t be dropping names here, though it’s increasingly easier to spot the key players by scrutinizing their public statements, business ventures, and affiliations.
Interestingly, the veil of secrecy seems to be lifting, as these individuals and the organizations driving their agenda are more openly revealing their intentions.
Take, for instance, a notable development on June 5, 2023. The United Nations, in a bold move, published a document explicitly outlining its plan to elevate the World Health Organization (WHO) as the central authority in global governance.
A critical excerpt from this document, the “Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response,” sheds light on their ambitions. This text, prepared for the September 20, 2023, General Assembly meeting, underwent significant changes by the time of its final release on September 1, 2023. Though the headings were removed, the document’s core objective to position the WHO as a de facto global governing body remains intact.
The WHO’s role, as the document suggests, will extend far beyond pandemic management. This is just the starting point, a strategic entry to establish its authority.
Next on the agenda is the promotion of universal health care, under the guise of enhancing pandemic preparedness. This is detailed in both the Zero Draft and the final text of the UN document.
But the WHO’s reach won’t stop there. Through the global One Health program, it aims to extend its influence into all aspects of “public health,” encompassing agriculture, pollution, travel, and climate change. This could lead to the WHO, or a derivative entity, assuming control over myriad government functions.
Moreover, the UN’s “Political Declaration” explicitly links health to “sustainable development,” intertwining the WHO’s pandemic authority with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals and Agenda 2030. This alignment signals a broader, more encompassing strategy for global governance.
The Global Power Shift and the Erosion of Democratic Principles
In a world where governments and global organizations are increasingly overstepping legal and democratic boundaries, recent developments point to a worrying trend of lawlessness at the highest levels. A glaring example is the U.N. General Assembly (UNGA) president’s controversial decision to approve a pivotal pandemic prevention declaration without a full assembly vote, despite objections from 11 member states.
Francis Boyle, a bioweapons expert and professor of international law, argues that these objections should have blocked the declaration from becoming part of international law. Yet, according to Boyle, the UNGA circumvented this by having its president, not the assembly, approve the declaration.
This declaration isn’t just a procedural issue. It entails far-reaching implications like making the COVID-19 measures permanent, advocating for universal vaccination, and pushing for increased surveillance, vaccine passports, and social media censorship. It introduces an “integrated One Health approach,” which, as previously discussed, could lead to the WHO governing all facets of human life.
The UNGA’s actions reveal a pattern typical of a “One World Government” mentality: flexible rules for the elite and stringent, punishing regulations for the masses. Critics, including The Defender, have slammed this as “hypocrisy” and “unhinged.”
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus links this approach to the U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals, suggesting that these measures are lessons learned from the pandemic. However, Dr. David Bell, a public health physician, views the declaration as empty rhetoric aimed at centralizing WHO’s power, at the cost of democracy, human rights, and equality.
Bell’s view is that the declaration is a façade for control, with countries not actively objecting being considered supporters. Boyle echoes this sentiment, describing the move as a globalist push for a “totalitarian medical and scientific police state” under WHO’s guise.
The unfolding situation paints a troubling picture of a future where global health decisions could override national sovereignty and individual rights, leading to a centralized authority with unprecedented control over our lives.
The Deep State’s Brazen Blueprint for Global Control
In the past few years, especially the last three, the so-called Deep State global mafia has been remarkably transparent about its ambitions. This isn’t a new phenomenon; the blueprint for a “New World Order” or a “One World Government” has been in the public domain for decades, evident in white papers, reports, movies, entertainment, and even in tabletop exercises.
But why would such a powerful group openly reveal its plans? Contrary to what might seem logical, their strategy is not based on secrecy but on a form of mass mind control, as explained in the video “Revealing the Method: Esoteric Symbolism as Mind Control.” The essence of their agenda is to condition the populace into accepting a loss of personal power, focusing on three key psychological conditions:
- Loss of memory (amnesia)
- Loss of will or initiative (abulia)
- Loss of interest in personal health and well-being (apathy)
These conditions are seen as prerequisites for the successful implementation of a global government. The tactics employed involve the subversion of sacred symbolism and archetypes, appealing to lower instincts and conflicting drives, thereby hindering spiritual and societal evolution.
The cabal’s use of symbolism is twofold: an assertion of dominance and a mocking gesture towards those they deem inferior. A particularly intriguing example is their inversion of commonly understood symbols. The hammer and sickle, for instance, widely recognized as symbols of the working class, carry a much darker occult meaning. They represent the division between earth and the divine, as symbolized by Saturn with his sickle. This division is central to the cabal’s fixation with the material world – its ownership, shaping, and control.
The hammer symbolizes the destruction of matter, the final act in a chaotic sequence to introduce a new order. This occult interpretation portrays the hammer and sickle not as symbols of unity and utopia but as emblems of a dystopian divide, the tyrannical rule of an elite class bent on separating humanity from divinity and leading it towards destruction.